Overview: A spaceship the size of a Greyhound toilet and her skeleton crew of intrepid space Nazis led by that British guy who narrated Winnie the Pooh attempt to die in a black hole with the help of mysterious hardened convict/gypsy ace navigator Tarzan, who likes his past the way he likes his planets: Dark.
Directed By: Albert Magnoli, 1997
The Case For: It's dark, and we're pretty sure there's at least one planet involved, so it's honest.
The Case Against: 1997. 1997, 1997, 1997, and 1997. 1799? 1979?! 1997!?! 1997. The SFX are so terrible that your face will melt off and explode like you opened the Ark of the Covenant except it'll look really lame and stupid and not cool at all like in that movie where that happened.
Ah, 1997. Remember 1997? We do. It was a pretty goddamn good year for movies. Even overlooking the seemingly endless procession of Oscar-caliber heavy-hitters like L.A. Confidential, Boogie Nights, Good Will Hunting, Donnie Brasco, Batman & Robin, etc., the competition was about as stiff as it gets without prosthetics involved. In sci-fi alone you had wry visual effects bonanzas like The Fifth Element and Starship Troopers, blockbusters like Men in Black; and dwarfing them all in sheer scale, budget, and Billy Zane content was Titanic, which, though unwatchably terrible, grossed something like $2 billion worldwide and caused more awkward teen sex to happen than any other event in human history.
This is the world into which the claustrophobic, wooden, nightmarish little ball of suffering that is Dark Planet was born.
Like any action-packed sci-fi adventure movie, Dark Planet likes to show off at every opportunity with fancy spaceship dogfights and outlandishly fantastical future tech like steam, Roombas and CRT monitors with words on them (to name a few). Unlike most sci-fi movies, the special effects here look like they were made by somebody who has never seen a movie, a camera, or light in general before:
And since it's been a whole two paragraphs, let's just go back and dwell on the fact that this movie was made in 1997. 1 9 9 7. Nineteen-fucking-ninety-seven. The special effects are so disastrously bad that we had to double-check to make sure the release date wasn't just a typo of 1979. Not that this would stack up particularly well with Alien, Star Trek or Moonraker either, but it would at least be more of a David vs. Goliath instead of David vs. an Oncoming Freight Train Made of Plutonium And Also On Fire.
Even ignoring the special effects, assuming that was humanly possible, there's plenty of failure to go around in Dark Planet. The vast majority of the cast haven't made it to the "moving and talking at the same time" part of their acting school curriculum yet. The plot is some ridiculous Cold War-inspired atomic hyperbullshit about two superpowers reluctantly coming together to avoid mutual destruction (remember: 1997.) But we're going to go ahead and give the gold star of shame to director Albert Magnoli. We have no idea/don't care who the hell he is or where he's from, but man we just bet he's one of those people whose name is pronounced "Al-bare," so you know what? Fuck you Albert. Al-BERT. T. TUH. How does it feel to end in a consonant, you son of a bitch?
Great, somebody's been pushing her buttons again, time for another mandatory sensitivity seminar.
Alber-T really goes above and beyond the call of duty here in order to put on a clinic on how not to make a film. Seriously, if you're an aspiring director, just save the money on film school and watch Dark Planet a few times instead, do the opposite of everything, and you'll be golden. Movie-making decisions you will learn to instinctually avoid like a lab rat in an electrified maze include, but are not limited to:
1) Stiff dialogue between two characters in which they blandly recite each others' backstory or make awkward and inappropriate sexual statements
2) Wordless and unnecessarily confusing actions
3) Constant extreme closeups of people sitting quietly, alone, not thinking or doing anything
4) Characters blacking out and waking up and blacking out and waking up over and over until you're not sure who or where you are anymore
5) Blatantly recycling this one shot of a wormhole over and over so many times that it completely dissolves the illusion of continuity and motion both within the fictional construct of your movie and indeed the entire universe
Of course we're just focusing on the negatives here, there are definitely some good qualities, like...uh...well, the camera is usually pretty steady, and nobody's head gets accidentally cut out of shots in every scene. Dark Planet: made by satisfactorily competent cameramen. There's a tagline that'll pack the theaters. Note: the actual tagline is "One final step for mankind" - we still haven't decided which one's worse.
More fake science from the mainstream scientists: Dr. Schrodinger claims cat is dead, but cat is alive and a dog.
Yeah, I went there. And I'll go there again. Don't believe me? I'm there ALREADY.
These all just look like normal cats to me.
From what I understand, this genre is about getting eaten by crocodiles. I excel at this.
Something Awful reviews the absolute worst movies out there. We focus mostly on horror and science fiction, because all writers here on Something Awful are huge nerds.